FDM09-I Bypass Thermal Mass Flow Transmitter Technical White Paper
- Home
- Solutions
- Technical Article
- FDM09-I Bypass Thermal Mass Flow Transmitter Technical White Paper
FDM09-I Bypass Thermal Mass Flow Transmitter Technical White Paper
1. Why Do Liquid Cooling Systems Need to Detect Subtle Flow Changes?
In AI, high-performance computing and high-power electronic equipment, coolant circulates continuously through CDUs, manifolds, equipment branches and cold plates. For equipment management, flow is more than a single reading: it is a key indicator of whether the liquid circuit is maintaining normal circulation.
As cold plate resistance increases, local pipe blockages develop, valve states change or pump operating conditions shift, main-pipe flow may initially show only a slight decrease or fluctuation. Clearer detection of these changes can provide earlier data to support equipment trend analysis, alarm settings and preventive maintenance.
| What Customers Need to Know | Conventional Focus on Instantaneous Readings | FDM09-I Design Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Is flow gradually deteriorating? | Displays the current flow | Focuses on change detection and trends |
Key Concept: Accuracy and Sensitivity Are Different.
Accuracy describes the error between the measured value and the actual flow. Sensitivity concerns whether the sensing signal responds clearly to a small change in input flow. The FDM09-I uses a Venturi and a bypass flow path to place the thermal mass sensing element in operating conditions better suited to detecting flow changes.
2. How Does the FDM09-I Measure Flow? A Visual Overview
2-1. FDM09-I Mechanical Design: Venturi + Bypass Thermal Mass Sensor
The figure below shows the current FDM09-I mechanical design and how the Venturi main flow path is integrated with the thermal mass sensor. The P1–P2 differential pressure directs a portion of the liquid into the thermal mass sensing section. Calibration then establishes the relationship between the bypass signal and total main-pipe flow.
Venturi main flow path + bypass thermal mass sensor; designed to extend the measurement range while maintaining the main-pipe flow field.
FDM09 Three-Cycle Measurement Consistency
Three-cycle average measurement accuracy: maximum error of approximately 0.63% F.S., meeting the ±1% F.S. requirement.
Expand to View Three-Cycle Average Measurement Data
| Three-Cycle Average Reference Flow (L/min) | Three-Cycle Average Digital Flow (L/min) | Average Error (L/min) | Average CTA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.96 | 14.51 | 0.54 | 1.892 |
| 33.48 | 33.86 | 0.38 | 1.993 |
| 45.88 | 46.42 | 0.54 | 2.034 |
| 54.02 | 54.27 | 0.25 | 2.054 |
| 61.99 | 61.89 | -0.11 | 2.072 |
| 70.43 | 70.50 | 0.07 | 2.088 |
| 76.94 | 77.33 | 0.39 | 2.098 |
| 83.37 | 83.94 | 0.57 | 2.108 |
| 89.88 | 90.00 | 0.12 | 2.116 |
| 96.20 | 96.98 | 0.78 | 2.125 |
| 102.60 | 102.98 | 0.38 | 2.131 |
| 108.55 | 109.10 | 0.55 | 2.138 |
| 114.50 | 115.23 | 0.73 | 2.143 |
| 120.57 | 121.27 | 0.70 | 2.149 |
| 126.48 | 127.12 | 0.63 | 2.154 |
| 132.19 | 133.15 | 0.95 | 2.159 |
| 138.07 | 138.96 | 0.88 | 2.163 |
| 143.91 | 144.77 | 0.86 | 2.168 |
| 149.69 | 150.23 | 0.54 | 2.173 |
3. Selecting the P1–P2 Bypass Orifice: Ø2 / Ø2.5 / Ø3 mm
The following first-stage design estimates are used to guide device verification. Assumptions: water at 25°C, ρ≈997 kg/m³, orifice discharge coefficient Cd≈0.62 and sensor internal diameter Ø3.8 mm. Calibration on the actual product must also account for pipe length, elbows, fittings, the sensor body and inlet/outlet flow resistance.
| Orifice Diameter | Bypass Characteristics | Flow Velocity at ΔP=2 kPa | Flow Velocity at ΔP=4 kPa | Design Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ø2.0 mm | Smaller | 0.34 m/s | 0.49 m/s | The signal may be weaker at low flow |
| Ø2.5 mm | Balanced | 0.54 m/s | 0.76 m/s | Recommended for Initial Verification |
| Ø3.0 mm | Larger | 0.77 m/s | 1.10 m/s | Flow velocity is relatively high at higher differential pressure |
4. Four Liquid Flow Measurement Technologies: A One-Page Comparison
No single flowmeter is the best choice for every application. Selection should consider the fluid, flow range, pressure loss, piping conditions, bubbles, installation space and downstream system integration. The table below provides a qualitative comparison for liquid cooling and equipment cooling applications.
| Comparison Item | FDM09-I Bypass Thermal Mass | Electromagnetic | Vortex | Ultrasonic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Principle | Venturi differential pressure + bypass heat transfer | Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction | von Kármán vortex shedding frequency | Ultrasonic propagation / transit-time difference |
| Fluid Requirements | Calibration is required for thermal properties; independent of electrical conductivity | Generally requires a conductive liquid | Liquids / gases / steam; stable vortex shedding is required | Requires suitable acoustic conditions |
| Low Flow / Subtle Changes | Design focus: a high-sensitivity operating range | Generally good, depending on pipe diameter and model | Low-flow performance is limited by the Reynolds number and signal strength | Depends on piping, fluid and signal quality |
| Main-Pipe Pressure Loss | Low to moderate; depends on Venturi and bypass design | Low; the measuring tube typically has no bluff body | Moderate; includes a bluff body (shedder bar) | Low; clamp-on models are particularly non-invasive |
| Effect of Bubbles | Large quantities of bubbles should be kept out of the sensing section | May affect measurement stability | Single-phase, stable flow conditions should be maintained | Bubbles may cause signal attenuation or measurement errors |
| Temperature Integration | Liquid temperature measurement can be integrated | Depends on the product configuration | Some products can integrate T/P measurement | Depends on the product configuration |
| Liquid Cooling Branch Applications | Suitable for monitoring subtle flow changes and liquid temperature | Suitable for general-purpose measurement of conductive coolants | Suitable for medium to high flow velocities and general industrial fluids | Suitable where low pressure loss or clamp-on installation is a priority |
5. Which Customers Are Best Suited to Each Measurement Principle?
6. Product Selection: Start with the Primary Requirement
Selection should consider more than a single accuracy figure. For liquid cooling equipment, other factors typically include minimum and maximum operating flow, the magnitude of flow changes, allowable pressure loss, pipe diameter, coolant formulation, bubbles, installation space and whether the system requires flow, liquid temperature and totalized flow data.
| When Clamp-on, Non-invasive Installation and Low Pressure Loss Are Priorities | Evaluate ultrasonic flowmeters first |
| When the Coolant Is Conductive and Proven General-Purpose Measurement Is Required | Evaluate electromagnetic flowmeters first |
| For General Industrial Applications with Medium to High Flow Velocities: Liquids / Gases / Steam | Evaluate vortex flowmeters first |
| When Subtle Flow Changes in Liquid Cooling Branches Need to Be Detected | Evaluate the FDM09-I first |
| When Liquid Temperature and Flow Trends Need to Be Integrated | The FDM09-I Can Offer a Distinctive Advantage |
7. From Flow Measurement to Liquid Cooling System Data
The FDM09-I Provides Value beyond Flow Measurement by turning flow and liquid temperature into data that a system can use for analysis.
| Available Data / Potential Extensions | Customer Value |
|---|---|
| Real-Time Flow | Monitor the current circulation status of the liquid circuit |
| Totalized Flow | Record the total quantity passing through over a period of time |
| Liquid Temperature | Understand the current thermal condition |
| Low-Flow Alarm | Provide an initial signal for abnormal-condition management |
| Trend Analysis | Observe changes in cold plate resistance, pipe blockages, pumps or valves |
| Heat Removal Rate | Can be calculated using the supply/return liquid temperature difference and coolant specific heat |
| Accumulated Cooling Energy | Integrating the heat removal rate over time can support energy management in kWh |
Application Positioning
8. From Design Estimates to Product Specifications: FDM09-I Validation Roadmap
This white paper distinguishes design concepts, engineering estimates and production specifications. The current P1–P2 orifice diameters and thermal mass sensor flow velocities are design estimates. Final specifications should be established from calibration results on the actual device.
9. Conclusion: What Makes the FDM09-I Different?
The FDM09-I combines a Venturi, a bypass flow path and thermal mass sensing to direct a portion of the liquid from the main pipe into a dedicated thermal sensing section.
The primary design objective is to keep the thermal mass sensing element in operating conditions better suited to detecting subtle flow changes. Flow, liquid temperature, instantaneous readings and totalized readings can then be integrated into liquid cooling equipment systems to support trend monitoring, abnormal-condition alarms and energy management.
References for the Technology Comparison
- Magnetic Flowmeters / Flowmeters: Electromagnetic flowmeters use Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction. They are suitable for conductive liquids, and their measuring tubes can provide low pressure loss.
- Vortex Flow Meter Technology / Low Flow Measurement: Vortex flowmeters use von Kármán vortex shedding. Low-flow performance is limited by the Reynolds number and signal strength.
- Ultrasonic Flowmeter Operating Instructions: Excessive bubbles in the liquid may cause measurement errors. Installation location and acoustic conditions must be considered.